Also, there was no systematic approach in these data. Source: FASEB Journal. Typological method of comparing languages is certainly its own advantages. Its essence is that do not need to carry out the restoration of the phonological system, and comparison is carried out through other languages, which makes it possible to quickly and more easily make an assessment of genetic relationships of languages. And a positive answer to this question, you can proceed to the consideration of similarity of languages at other levels. Thus, both languages are 100% agglutinating in them there is a ban on prefexation, and word forms of languages are Altaic model in both languages, there is no change of verbs in number and those forms of language and vocabulary are similar in structure. If we take the verb forms, the majority of them are produced in both languages, from the basics, which in Korean language – two and a Japanese – five.

There is also a similar algorithm Education verbs by changing the endings. In Korean and Japanese are only two basic time – the present-future tense and past tense. Kinship Japanese and Korean languages studied for nearly three centuries. But, until the 45 th year of the twentieth century, this question in Japan takes a little due to the fact that the ruling circles of the country supports the theory "Divine origin" of the nation and denied such a possibility as ties of kinship with some other nation. In the early twentieth century in Japan conducted research on linkages of Korean and Japanese languages, Japanese claimed that the Korean language is descended from Japanese, rather than vice versa, which corresponded to policies pursued by Japan towards Korea.